![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
Technical Tip 24: The following question and answer are from the DOL Q&A Session at the 2000 ASPPA Annual Conference:
Many 401(k) plans charge a participant for a distribution of the participant’s benefits. For example, I was recently involved in a case where a major mutual fund company, in a bundled arrangement, charged approximately $50 for distributions, but waived that charge if the distribution was rolled over into an IRA funded with their investment product. Is it proper to charge individual participants, or their accounts, for distributions of their retirement benefits?
DOL Response: The issue of participant charges for distributions is the subject of pending requests for guidance from the Department which are currently under consideration.
The question also raises the issue of reasonableness of fees, that is, is the charge for the distributions reasonable or excessive (e.g., 100 distributions times $50 equals $5,000). The plan fiduciaries must evaluate the services and the costs in making that decision.
See the Homer Elliott Advisory Opinion (94-32A). That DOL Opinion states, in part:
Accordingly, it is the view of the Department that imposing a separate fee or cost on a participant or alternate payee (either directly or as a charge against a plan account) in connection with a determination of the status of a domestic relations order or administration of a QDRO would constitute an impermissible encumbrance on the exercise of the right of an alternate payee, under Title I of ERISA, to receive benefits under a QDRO. Additionally, in the Department's view, because Title I of ERISA imposes specific statutory duties on plan administrators regarding QDRO determinations and the administration of QDROs, reasonable administrative expenses thus incurred by the plan may not appropriately be allocated to the individual participants and beneficiaries affected by the QDRO."
_________________________
Comment by the RL&R ERISA attorneys: The rationale of the advisory opinion--that plans cannot charge participants for the exercise of a legal right--suggests that plans cannot charge participants for a distribution of benefits--at least for the primary form of benefit.
© 2012 Reish Luftman Reicher & Cohen, a Professional Corporation
Important notice: Answers are provided as general guidance on the subjects covered in the question and are not provided as legal advice to the questioner's situation. Any legal issues should be reviewed by your legal counsel to apply the law to the particular facts of your situation.
|
||||
|
|
11755 Wilshire Blvd., 10th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90025-1539 Phone: (310) 478-5656 Fax: (310) 478-5831 About Us | Practice Areas | Attorneys | Publications | Events | Recruiting | Contact Us | Site Map | Home © 2000 - , Reish & Reicher, A Professional Corporation. All Rights Reserved. |